Invitation to a Second-Tier Conversation about:
Collective Intelligence/We-space
Dominant Monads
Please note that I'm using Ken Wilber's term "we-space" here but my intended referent is pretty much the same as for the terms "collective intelligence," "collective presencing," "collective insight," "transparent communication field," etc.
In his talk with Terry Patten on July 23, 2013, (available currently to Integral Living Room Event participants) Ken Wilber asserted that no We-spaces have a dominant monad. Based on my experience and experiences I have read about, I suggest that for me, the reality is a bit more complex than that, and I am inviting further conversation here with anyone who would like! What kind of conversation could we have about this? I am offering some seeds.
(And what difference does it make?) I will suggest below it can make a lot of difference, what we sense or believe on this question.
(And what difference does it make?) I will suggest below it can make a lot of difference, what we sense or believe on this question.
